Comparative biomechanics of all-on-4 and vertical implant placement in asymmetrical mandibular: a finite element study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical scenarios frequently present challenges when patients exhibit asymmetrical mandibular atrophy. The dilemma arises: should we adhere to the conventional All-on-4 technique, or should we contemplate placing vertically oriented implants on the side with sufficient bone mass? This study aims to employ three-dimensional finite element analysis to simulate and explore the biomechanical advantages of each approach. METHODS: A finite element model, derived from computed tomography (CT) data, was utilized to simulate the nonhomogeneous features of the mandible. Three configurations-All-on-4, All-on-5-v and All-on-5-o were studied. Vertical and oblique forces of 200 N were applied unilaterally, and vertical force of 100 N was applied anteriorly to simulate different masticatory mechanisms. The maximum von Mises stresses on the implant and framework were recorded, as well as the maximum equivalent strain in the peri-implant bone. RESULTS: The maximum stress values for all designs were located at the neck of the distal implant, and the maximum strains in the bone tissue were located around the distal implant. The All-on-5-o and All-on-5-v models exhibited reduced stresses and strains compared to All-on-4, highlighting the potential benefits of the additional implant. There were no considerable differences in stresses and strains between the All-on-5-o and All-on-5-v groups. CONCLUSIONS: With the presence of adequate bone volume on one side and severe atrophy of the contralateral bone, while the "All-on-4 concept" is a viable approach, vertical implant placement optimizes the transfer of forces between components and tissues.

Diamond-Like Carbon Coating Reduces Connection Screw Head Stripping After Multiple Tightening Instances.

The stability of implant-abutment joint is fundamental for the long-term success of implant rehabilitation. The screw loosening, fracture, and head deformation are among the most common mechanical complications. Several surface treatments of titanium screws have been proposed to improve their resistance and stability. Diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating of the materials is widely used to increase their wear resistance and durability. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of carbon fiber coating on the screw head on screw removal torque and screw head stripping. One hundred titanium implant screws were used, 50 without coating (Group 1) and 50 with DLC coating of the screw head (Group 2). Each screw was tightened with a torque of 25 Ncm and unscrewed 10 times. The removal torque was measured with a digital cap torque tester for each loosening. Optical 3d measurement of the screw head surface was performed by a fully automatic machine before and after multiple tightening to investigate surface modifications. The reverse torque values decreased with repeated tightening and loosening cycles in both groups without significant differences (P > .05). Optical measurements of surface dimensions revealed average changes of 0.0357 mm in Group 1 and 0.02312 mm in Group 2, which resulted to be statistically significant (P < .001). The DLC coating of the retention screw head can prevent its distortion and wear, especially after multiple tightening.

Biomechanical behavior of implant retained prostheses in the posterior maxilla using different materials: a finite element study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of the mesial and distal off-axial extensions of implant-retained prostheses in the posterior maxilla with different prosthetic materials using finite element analysis (FEA). METHODS: Three dimensional (3D) finite element models with three implant configurations and prosthetic designs (fixed-fixed, mesial cantilever, and distal cantilever) were designed and modelled depending upon cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of an intact maxilla of an anonymous patient. Implant prostheses with two materials; Monolithic zirconia (Zr) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) were also modeled .The 3D modeling software Mimics Innovation Suite (Mimics 14.0 / 3-matic 7.01; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) was used. All the models were imported into the FE package Marc/Mentat (ver. 2015; MSC Software, Los Angeles, Calif). Then, individual models were subjected to separate axial loads of 300 N. Von mises stress values were computed for the prostheses, implants, and bone under axial loading. RESULTS: The highest von Mises stresses in implant (111.6 MPa) and bone (100.0 MPa) were recorded in distal cantilever model with PEKK material, while the lowest values in implant (48.9 MPa) and bone (19.6 MPa) were displayed in fixed fixed model with zirconia material. The distal cantilever model with zirconia material yielded the most elevated levels of von Mises stresses within the prosthesis (105 MPa), while the least stresses in prosthesis (35.4 MPa) were recorded in fixed fixed models with PEKK material. CONCLUSIONS: In the light of this study, the combination of fixed fixed implant prosthesis without cantilever using a rigid zirconia material exhibits better biomechanical behavior and stress distribution around bone and implants. As a prosthetic material, low elastic modulus PEKK transmitted more stress to implants and surrounding bone especially with distal cantilever.

Comparative analysis of stress distribution in residual roots with different canal morphologies: evaluating CAD/CAM glass fiber and other post-core materials.

BACKGROUND: The selection of post-core material holds significant importance in endodontically treated teeth, influencing stress distribution in the dental structure after restoration. The use of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) glass fiber post-core possesses a better adaptation for different root canal morphologies, but whether this results in a more favorable stress distribution has not been clearly established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study employed finite element analysis to establish three models of post-core crown restoration with normal, oversized, and dumbbell-shaped root canals. The three models were restored using three different materials: CAD/CAM glass fiber post-core (CGF), prefabricated glass fiber post and resin core (PGF), and cobalt-chromium integrated metal post-core (Co-Cr), followed by zirconia crown restoration. A static load was applied and the maximum equivalent von Mises stress, maximum principal stress, stress distribution plots, and the peak of maximum displacement were calculated for dentin, post-core, crown, and the cement acting as the interface between the post-core and the dentin. RESULTS: In dentin of three different root canal morphology, it was observed that PGF exhibited the lowest von Mises stresses, while Co-Cr exhibited the highest ones under a static load. CGF showed similar stress distribution to that of Co-Cr, but the stresses were more homogeneous and concentrated apically. In oversized and dumbbell-shaped root canal remnants, the equivalent von Mises stress in the cement layer using CGF was significantly lower than that of PGF. CONCLUSIONS: In oversized root canals and dumbbell-shaped root canals, CGF has shown good performance for restoration of endodontically treated teeth. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides a theoretical basis for clinicians to select post-core materials for residual roots with different root canal morphologies and should help to reduce the occurrence of complications such as root fracture and post-core debonding.

A finite element analysis study on different angle correction designs for inclined implants in All-On-Four protocol.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate, through finite element analysis (FEA), the biomechanical behavior of the built-in angle corrected dental implant versus implant with angled multiunit abutment used in All-On-Four treatment protocol. METHODS: Two (3D) finite element models of a simplified edentulous mandible were constructed with two different posterior implant designs based on the All-On-Four protocol. Four implants were placed in each model, the two anterior implants were positioned vertically at the lateral incisor/canine sites. Depending on the implant fixture design in posterior area, there are two models created; Model I; the mandible was rehabilitated with four co-axis (4 mm in diameter × 15 mm in length) implants with distally built-in angle corrected implants (24-degree angle correction) .While Model II, the mandible was rehabilitated with four conventional (4 mm in diameter × 14 mm in length) implants with a distally inclined posterior implants (25 degree) and angled multiunit abutments. CAD software (Solidworks© 2017; Dassault Systems Solidworks Corp) was used to model the desired geometry. Axial and inclined Loads were applied on the two models. A Finite element analysis study was done using an efficient software ANSYS© with specified materials. The resultant equivalent Von-Misses stresses (VMS), maximum principal stresses and deformation analysis were calculated for each part (implants and prosthetic components). RESULTS: When applying axial and non-axial forces, model II (angled multiunit model) showed higher deformation on the level of Ti mesh about 13.286 µm and higher VMS 246.68 MPa than model I (angle corrected implant). Model I exhibited higher maximum stresses 107.83 MPa than Model II 94.988 MPa but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Within the limitation of the FEA study, although angle correcting implant design is showing higher values in maximum principle stresses compared with angled multiunit abutments, model deformation and resultant VMS increased with angled multiunit abutments. The angle correcting designs at implant level have more promising results in terms of deformation and VMS distribution than angle correction at abutment level.

Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess stress distribution in peri-implant bone and attachments of mandibular overdentures retained by small diameter implants, and to explore the impact of implant distribution on denture stability. METHODS: Through three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis (3D FEA), four models were established: three models of a two mandibular implants retained overdenture (IOD) and one model of a conventional complete denture (CD). The three IOD models consisted of one with two implants in the bilateral canine area, another with implants in the bilateral lateral incisor area, and the third with one implant in the canine area, and another in the lateral incisor area. Three types of loads were applied on the overdenture for each model: a 100 N vertical load and a inclined load on the left first molar, and a100N vertical load on the lower incisors. The stress distribution in the peri-implant bone, attachments, and the biomechanical behaviors of the overdentures were analyzed. RESULTS: Despite different distribution of implants, the maximum stress values in peri-implant bone remained within the physiological threshold for all models across three loading conditions. The dispersed implant distribution design (implant in the canine area) exhibited the highest maximum stress in peri-implant bone (822.8 µe) and the attachments (275 MPa) among the three IOD models. The CD model demonstrated highest peak pressure on mucosa under three loading conditions (0.8188 Mpa). The contact area between the denture and mucosa of the CD model was smaller than that in the IOD models under molar loading, yet it was larger in the CD model compared to the IOD model under anterior loading. However, the contact area between the denture and mucosa under anterior loading in all models was significantly smaller than those under molar loading. The IOD in all three models exhibited significantly less rotational movement than the complete denture. Different implant positions had minimal impact on the rotational movement of the IOD. CONCLUSION: IOD with implants in canine area exhibited the highest maximum stress in the peri-implant bone and attachments, and demonstrated increased rotational movement. The maximum principal stress was concentrated around the neck of the small diameter one-piece implant, rather than in the abutment. An overdenture retained by two implants showed better stability than a complete denture.

Removal of broken abutment screws using ultrasonic tip - a heat development in-vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Dental implants can cause complications, including the loosening of the abutment screw or fracture. However, there is no standardized technique for removing broken abutment screws. This necessitates further research. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure heat generation during screw removal to better understand its implications for dental implant procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The experimental setup involved using synthetic bone blocks and titanium implants. An ultrasonically operated instrument tip was utilized for screw removal. Infrared thermometry was employed for accurate temperature measurement, considering factors such as emissivity and distance. Statistical analysis using linear regression and ANOVA was conducted. RESULTS: The findings revealed an initial rapid temperature increase during the removal process, followed by a gradual decrease. The regression model demonstrated a strong correlation between time and temperature, indicating the heat generation pattern. CONCLUSION: Heat generation during screw removal poses risks such as tissue damage and integration issues. Clinicians should minimize heat risks through an intermittent approach. The lack of a standardized technique requires further research and caution. Understanding the generated heat optimizes implant procedures.

Biomechanical influence of narrow-diameter implants placed at the crestal and subcrestal level in the maxillary anterior region. A 3D finite element analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tendency of movement, stress distribution, and microstrain of single-unit crowns in simulated cortical and trabecular bone, implants, and prosthetic components of narrow-diameter implants with different lengths placed at the crestal and subcrestal levels in the maxillary anterior region using 3D finite element analysis (FEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six 3D models were simulated using Invesalius 3.0, Rhinoceros 4.0, and SolidWorks software. Each model simulated the right anterior maxillary region including a Morse taper implant of Ø2.9 mm with different lengths (7, 10, and 13 mm) placed at the crestal and subcrestal level and supporting a cement-retained monolithic single crown in the area of tooth 12. The FEA was performed using ANSYS 19.2. The simulated applied force was 178 N at 0°, 30°, and 60°. The results were analyzed using maps of displacement, von Mises (vM) stress, maximum principal stress, and microstrain. RESULTS: Models with implants at the subcrestal level showed greater displacement. vM stress increased in the implant and prosthetic components when implants were placed at the subcrestal level compared with the crestal level; the length of the implants had a low influence on the stress distribution. Higher stress and strain concentrations were observed in the cortical bone of the subcrestal placement, independent of implant length. Non-axial loading influenced the increased stress and strain in all the evaluated structures. CONCLUSIONS: Narrow-diameter implants positioned at the crestal level showed a more favorable biomechanical behavior for simulated cortical bone, implants, and prosthetic components. Implant length had a smaller influence on stress or strain distribution than the other variables.

Hybrid surface implants: Influence of residual stress on mechanical behavior, evaluated by finite element analysis and validation by fatigue tests.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of different surface roughness and residual stress of hybrid surface implants on their behavior and mechanical failure. METHODS: Three types of implants with different surface roughness were used as specimens: smooth, rough, and hybrid. A diffractometer was used to determine the residual stress of the implants according to their different surface treatment. These results were used as an independent variable in a finite element analysis that compared the three specimens to determine the von Mises stress transferred to the implants and supporting bone and the resulting microdeformations. Flexural strength and fatigue behavior tests were performed to compare the results of the three types of implants. RESULTS: Higher residual stress values were found for rough surfaces (p < 0.05, Student's t-test) compared to smooth surfaces, and both types of stress were different for the two types of hybrid implant surfaces. Finite element analysis found different von Mises stress and microdeformation results, both at the level of the implant and the bone, for the three types of implants under study. These results were correlated with the different flexural strength behaviors (lower resistance for hybrids and higher for rough surfaces, p < 0.05) and fatigue behavior (the rough implant had the longest fatigue life, while the hybrid implant exhibited the worst fatigue behavior). SIGNIFICANCE: The results show a trend toward a less favorable mechanical behavior of the hybrid implants related to the retention of different residual stresses caused by the surface treatment.

Biomechanical performance of dental implants inserted in different mandible locations and at different angles: A finite element study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Accurate implant placement is essential for the success of dental implants. This placement influences osseointegration and occlusal forces. The freehand technique, despite its cost-effectiveness and time efficiency, may result in significant angular deviations compared with guided implantation, but the effect of angular deviations on the stress-strain state of peri-implant bone is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this finite element analysis (FEA) study was to examine the effects of angular deviations on stress-strain states in peri-implant bone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computational modeling was used to investigate 4 different configurations of dental implant positions, each with 3 angles of insertion. The model was developed using computed tomography images, and typical mastication forces were considered. Strains were analyzed using the mechanostat hypothesis. RESULTS: The location of the implant had a significant impact on bone strain intensity. An angular deviation of ±5 degrees from the planned inclination did not significantly affect cancellous bone strains, which primarily support the implant. However, it had a substantial effect on strains in the cortical bone near the implant. Such deviations also significantly influenced implant stresses, especially when the support from the cortical bone was uneven or poorly localized. CONCLUSIONS: In extreme situations, angular deviations can lead to overstraining the cortical bone, risking implant failure from unfavorable interaction with the implant. Accurate implant placement is essential to mitigate these risks.

Comparative analysis of the biomechanical behavior of the maxillary central incisors restored with glass fiber post and cast metal post and core submitted to orthodontic forces: A study with finite elements.

INTRODUCTION: Different types of intraradicular restorations and their insertion have an impact on teeth biomechanics. This study aimed to analyze the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored with glass fiber post (GFP) and cast metal post and core (CMP) subjected to buccolingual and mesiodistal orthodontic forces using the finite element method. METHODS: Two models of the maxillary central incisor with periodontal ligament, cortical bone, and trabecular bone were made. One of the models included intraradicular restoration with GFP, whereas, in the other, the incisor was restored with CMP. After creating the tridimensional mesh of finite elements, applying 2 orthodontic forces were simulated: 65 g of buccolingual force and 70 g of mesiodistal force. The forces were applied parallel to the palatal plane in the region of the bracket slot, located 4 mm to the incisal edge. RESULTS: The maximum stresses generated in the GFP-restored root were 3.642 × 10-1 MPa and 4.755 × 10-1 MPa from the buccolingual and mesiodistal forces, respectively. Likewise, the stresses in the CMP restored root were 2.777 × 10-1MPa and 3.826 × 10-1MPa. The radicular area with higher stress on both models was located in the cervical third: on the buccal surface when the buccolingual force was applied and on the mesial surface when the mesiodistal force was applied. The highest stress levels were found on the CMP structure. CONCLUSIONS: The incisor restored with cast metal post revealed lower stress values transferred to the root than the one restored with GFP. The stresses on the structure of the GFP were lower and more homogeneous than the ones found on the cast metal post. The difference among the stress values in the materials is within a safe margin for using both materials in relation to orthodontic forces.

Crestal strain of two-implant mandibular overdentures with implants placed at different positions: An in vitro 3D printed simulation study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The 2-implant mandibular overdenture (2IMO) is a popular treatment for patients with mandibular edentulism. However, information on the influence of implant positions on crestal strain is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the crestal strain around 2 implants to support mandibular overdentures when placed at different positions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Edentulous mandibles were 3-dimensionally (3D) designed separately with 2 holes for implant placement at similar distances of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm from the midline, resulting in 4 study conditions. The complete denture models were 3D designed and printed from digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) images after scanning the patient's denture. Two 4.3×12-mm dummy implants were placed in the preplanned holes. Two linear strain gauges were attached on the crest of the mesial and distal side of each implant (CH1, CH2, CH3, and CH4) and connected to a computer to record the electrical signals. Male LOCATOR attachments were attached, the mucosal layer simulated, and the denture picked up with pink female nylon caps. A unilateral and bilateral force of 100 N was maintained for 10 seconds for each model in a universal testing machine while recording the maximum strains in the DCS-100A KYOWA computer software program. Data were analyzed by using 1-way analysis of variance, the Tukey post hoc test, and the paired t test (α=.05). RESULTS: Under bilateral loading, the strain values indicated a trend with increasing distance between the implants with both right and left distal strain gauges (CH4 and CH1). The negative (-ve) values indicated the compressive force, and the positive (+ve) values indicated the tensile force being applied on the strain gauges. The strain values for CH4 ranged between -166.08 for the 5-mm and -251.58 for the 20-mm position; and for CH1 between -168.08 for the 5-mm and -297.83 for the 20-mm position. The remaining 2 mesial strain gauges for all 4 implant positions remained lower than for CH4 and CH1. Under unilateral-right loading, only the right-side distal strain gauge CH4 indicated the increasing trend in the strain values with -147.5 for the 5-mm, -157.17 for the 10-mm, -209.33 for the 15-mm, and -234.75 for the 20 mm position. The remaining 3 strain gauges CH3, CH2, and CH1 ranged between -28.33 and -107.17. For each position for both implants, significantly higher (P<.05) strain values were observed on the distal strain gauge channels CH4 and CH1 than on the mesial channels CH3 and CH2 under bilateral loading and on the right side under unilateral loading. CONCLUSIONS: Peri-implant crestal strains in the 2IMO increased by increasing the distance of the implants from the midline. The stress values progressively increased from 5 to 10 mm to 15 to 20 mm from midline, represented as lateral incisor, canine, and premolar positions. The distal side of the implants exhibits higher strains than the mesial side of the implants.

Different Surgical Techniques in the All-on-4 Treatment Concept: Evaluation of the Stress Distribution Created in Implant and Peripheral Bone with Finite Element Analysis.

PURPOSE: To examine the stresses caused by different All-on-4 surgical techniques-conventional, a combination of monocortical and bicortical, bicortical, and nasal floor elevation-on the implant and the surrounding bone using 3D finite element analysis (FEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D bone model of the atrophic maxilla was created based on CT imaging of the fully edentulous adult patient. All implants used in the models were 4 mm in diameter, and the length was 13 mm in the anterior and 15 mm in the posterior. Implants were applied to four different atrophic maxillary models with the All-on-4 technique: anterior and posterior monocortical implants in the first model, anterior monocortical and posterior bicortical in the second model, anterior and posterior bicortical in the third model, and anterior and posterior bicortical with nasal floor elevation in the fourth model. Eight linear analyses were performed by applying force from both vertical and 45-degree oblique directions to the four models prepared in our study. RESULTS: When the cortical and cancellous bone around the anterior implants was examined, it was observed that the oblique and vertical loading conditions and the stresses around the implant were similar in all models. When the posterior implants were examined, model 1 (ie, anterior and posterior monocortical implants) showed the greatest oblique compression, vertical compression, and vertical tension forces. According to the Von Mises stress (VMS) analysis results for anterior and posterior implants, higher values were observed in model 1 compared to models 3 and 4 under oblique and vertical forces. It was observed that bicortical placement of the implants reduced the stresses on the bone and implant-abutment system but had no significant effect on the stress on the bar. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of our study, in the All-on-4 technique, bicortical placement of the implants reduced the stresses on the bone and implant when the anatomical limitations allowed. In addition, nasal floor elevation can be applied in the atrophic maxilla in appropriate indications.

A comparative study to evaluate microstrain of low-profile attachment associated with and without bar connection in implant assisted mandibular overdenture (in vitro study).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the microstrain transmitted to peri-implant tissues of implant-assisted mandibular overdentures using two different low-profile attachment designs; OT- Equator attachment with and without bar attachment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A completely edentulous epoxy resin mandibular model was used, in which two parallel dental implants were inserted at the canine region bilaterally and one in the middle. Sixteen identical complete edentulous mandibular overdentures were fabricated following conventional, standardized techniques and were divided equally between two groups according to the design and placement of the OT-Equator. Group A implants were kept solitary with an OT-Equator attachment, while group B implants were kept splinted with a bar associated with two mini-OT-Equator attachments in between. Sixteen identical mandibular complete overdentures were constructed, to which attachments were picked up. The difference in stress distribution was measured using strain gauges and compared between the two studied groups. A vertical load of 100 N using the universal testing machine was applied unilaterally on the left mesial fossae of the mandibular first molar and bilaterally on the bar attached to the mandibular premolar molar region of the overdentures. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS version 28. Normality was checked by using the Shapiro-Wilk test and normality plots. The Mann-Whitney U test was then used to analogize the groups. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between groups A and B upon application of vertical unilateral and bilateral loadings of 100 N, with mean microstrain values of P 0.05. Group A (OT-Equator attachment) showed lower strain values than Group B (OT-Equator bar attachment) upon application of vertical, unilateral, and bilateral loadings of 100 N. CONCLUSIONS: Implant-assisted mandibular overdenture with a solitary attachment is associated with lower microstrain values around the implants after application of unilateral and bilateral vertical loadings of 100 N.

Comparative evaluation to study the effect of implant support on complete fixed dental prosthesis fabricated with peek framework when implants placed in all-on-4 and all-on-6 situation, by strain gauge analysis and finite element analysis - An in vitro study.

Aim: To evaluate and compare the strain development and distribution of maxillary implant-supported complete fixed dental prosthesis (ISCFDP) with computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing milled PEEK BIO-HPP superstructure when placed using All-on-4 and All-on-6 situation using a strain gauge and finite element analysis (FEA). Setting and Design: This is an in vitro study to evaluate and compare the stress minimization and strain developed at implant in premolar and in two clinically simulated situation of All-on-4 and All-on -6 ISCFDP. Materials and Methods: The study involved converting a human skull into. stl format to create 3D-printed stereolithography models with a modulus of elasticity closer to bone. Implants were placed in two models (M1 nad M2) in incisor, premolar, and pterygoid regions. A fixed dental prosthesis framework was fabricated on both models, and strain gauge sensors were attached. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive and analytical statistics were done. The normality of data was analyzed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Results: The results obtained were tabulated and it showed strain around the neck of ISCFDP under 100N configuration in strain gauge analysis. Stress was found more in the molar region when compared to the premolar region. This design showed that the largest stress around the neck of ISFDP under 100 N load was found more in the premolar region when compared to the molar region due to the reduction of stresses in the pterygoid region in FEA. Conclusion: In the present study, strain gauge analysis at 100 N for loading at the premolar and molar region shows the reduced strain on tilted implants in All-on-6 situation due to stress dissipation to the terminal pterygoid implant using strain gauge.

Effects of cyclic loading on loss of abutment screw torque of angled screw channel single implant crowns on narrow diameter implants.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Screw access channels that emerge on the facial aspect of anterior screw-retained implant crowns can compromise esthetics. Recently, angled screw channels (ASCs) have been developed that can alter screw access channel angulations to improve esthetics. While ASCs can be used on narrow-diameter implants, information is limited on the loss of abutment screw torque on narrow-diameter implants with ASCs. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the loss of abutment screw torque after thermocycling and the cyclic loading of ASCs from 3 different companies connected to narrow-diameter implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 40 narrow-diameter implants (NobelReplace Conical Connection 3.5×11.5 mm) were mounted individually in acrylic resin blocks and divided equally into 4 groups. The first group, NB-0 (Control), consisted of screw-retained zirconia crowns fabricated on ASCs at 0-degree angulation (n=10). The other 3 groups consisted of a total of 30 screw-retained zirconia crowns fabricated on ASCs at 20-degree angulation: NB-20 (Angulated Screw Channel Solutions), ATL-20 (Atlantis Custom Base Solution with angulated screw access), and DA-20 (Dynamic TiBase). Each crown was secured on the mounted implant with its corresponding titanium base insert and screw and then tightened to the manufacturer's recommended torque with a digital torque gauge. The initial reverse torque value (RTVI) was obtained and recorded at baseline. Subsequently, a new set of screws were tightened to recommended values, and each specimen underwent thermocycling and then cyclic loading at 0 to 100 N at 10 Hz for 1 million cycles to simulate 1year of functional loading. After cyclic loading, the final reverse torque values (RTVF) were recorded and compared with the RTVI to evaluate the percentage torque loss (PTLF). Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis analysis, Rank base analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and the Tukey HSD post hoc comparisons (α=.05). RESULTS: Significant differences were found for the PTLF among all groups after cyclic loading (P<.001). The PTLF in ATL-20 (51.4%) was significantly higher than in NB-0 (22.2%) (P<.001) and NB-20 (29.2%) (P=.010). No significant difference was found in the PTLF among other groups (P>.05). CONCLUSIONS: The abutment screw torque loss after cyclic loading of the ASCs on narrow diameter implants among the 4 groups did not perform comparably. The largest percentage torque loss was recorded for the ATL-20 group. The NB-20 group demonstrated the lowest percentage torque loss. DA-20 showed percentage torque loss less than ATL-20; however, its RTVF was the lowest.

Precision of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) or cobalt-chrome implant bar fit to implants after mechanical cycling.

Based on its mechanical properties, PEEK (polyether-ether-ketone) might be useful in restorative procedures. In oral rehabilitation, its viability has been studied mainly for prostheses and dental implants. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fit accuracy of dental implant bars made of either PEEK or cobalt-chrome submitted to cycling mechanics. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This was an experimental in vitro study, where units were treated with two implants and mini-abutments, joined by cobalt-chrome or polyether-ether-ketone PEEK bars. A total 20 bars were prepared (n=10 per group) and subjected to mechanical cycling tests (1 million cycles on the distal cantilever of the bar in the vertical direction, 120N and sinusoidal loading, at a frequency of 2Hz). The fit at the abutment/implant interface was measured before and after cycling, and the counter-torque of the vertical screw of the mini abutments was measured after cycling, using a digital torquemeter. Data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. RESULTS: No statistically significant interaction was found among the three factors considered (bar material, implant positioning and mechanical cycling) (p = 0.592). No significant difference was identified in the interaction between bar material and implant positioning (p = 0.321), or between implant positioning and mechanical cycling (p = 0.503). The association between bar material and mechanical cycling was statistically significant (p = 0.007), with the cobalt-chrome bar resulting in greater misfit with mechanical cycling. There was no difference in counter-torque values between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The PEEK bar provided better fit of the mini abutments to the implants, even after mechanical cycling. The counter-torque of the screws was similar in all scenarios considered.

O PEEK (Poli-éter-éter-cetona) é um material considerado para uso em procedimentos restauradores devido às suas propriedades mecânicas. Na reabilitação oral, sua viabilidade tem sido estudada principalmente para uso em próteses e implantes dentários. Objetivos: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a precisão da adaptação de duas barras diferentes do tipo protocolo confeccionadas em PEEK ou Cobalto-Cromo, após serem submetidas à mecânica ciclística. Materiais e Método: As unidades experimentais foram constituídas por barras confeccionadas em Poli-ether-ether-Ketone (PEEK) e em Cobalto-Cromo (Co-Cr). Trata-se de um estudo experimental, in vitro, onde verificou-se unidades constituídas por dois implantes e mini pilares unidos com barras de Cobalto-Cromo ou PEEK. Foram confeccionados um total de 20 barras (n=10 em cada grupo) e as barras foram submetidas a ensaios de ciclagem mecânica (1 milhão de ciclos no cantilever distal da barra no sentido vertical, 120N e carregamento senoidal, a uma frequência de 2Hz). Antes e após a ciclagem realizou-se a mensuração da desadaptação na interface pilar/implante e após a ciclagem foi medido o contra-torque do parafuso vertical dos mini-pilares através de torquímetro digital TQ 8800 (LT Lutron, Taiwan). Os dados foram submetidos a ANOVA a três critérios e teste de Tukey ao nível de significância a 5%. Resultados: Constatou-se que não houve interação estatisticamente significativa entre os três fatores estudados, ou seja, entre o material da barra, o posicionamento do implante e a ciclagem mecânica (p = 0,592). Também não se identificou diferença estatística significativa da interação entre o material da barra e o posicionamento do implante (p = 0,321), nem entre o posicionamento do implante e a ciclagem mecânica (p = 0,503). Já a associação entre o material da barra e a ciclagem mecânica foi estatisticamente significativa (p = 0,007), onde a barra de Cobalto-Cromo resultou em maior desadaptação com a ciclagem mecânica. Não houve diferença nos valores dos contra-torques entre os grupos. Conclusões: Conclui-se que a barra de protocolo fabricada em PEEK proporcionou melhor adaptação dos mini pilares aos implantes mesmo após a ciclagem mecânica. Por fim, o contra-torque dos parafusos foi semelhante em todos os cenários avaliados.

Biomechanical comparison of different framework materials in mandibular overdenture prosthesis supported with implants of different sizes: a finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the stresses on the supporting bone, implants, and framework materials under masticatory forces in mandibular overdenture prostheses modeled with different framework materials and different implant types, using the Finite Element Analysis (FEA). METHODS: For the finite element modeling, two identical mandibular jaw models were created; one with two standard (diameter:4.1 mm/12 mm length) and the other with two mini-implants (diameter:2.4 mm/12 mm length) were placed in the canine teeth area. The polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) denture was modeled upon them, supported by Cobalt Chromium alloy (CoCr), Poly-ether ether ketone (PEEK), and Zantex materials with framework. No framework was added as a control model; only PMMA overdenture prosthesis was modeled. RESULTS: Regardless of the framework materials of the overdenture prostheses, the stress values ​​on mini-implants in all models yielded approximately two times higher results comparing to standard implants. More stress transmission was observed in the supporting bone and implants in the control prostheses and overdenture prostheses supported with respectively PEEK, Zantex, CoCr alloy frameworks, respectively. In the framework materials, more stress occurred on CoCr, Zantex and PEEK in that order. CONCLUSION: In the light of this study, the use of mini-implants as an alternative to standard implants is not promising in terms of distribution and transmission of chewing stresses. As a framework material, standard rigid metal alloys were found to be more advantageous than polymer materials in terms of stress distribution.

Evaluation of Implant Location on Fiber-Reinforced Maxillary Overdentures with Finite Element Method.

PURPOSE: To examine and compare stress values of implants, highest tensile and compressive values, and their distribution in cortical and trabecular bone near and around the implant region using different materials (aramid fiber, glass fiber, polyethylene fiber, carbon fiber, and cobalt-chromium [Co-Cr] alloy). Four dental implants were placed in the maxillary crest with two different location scenarios, and the 3D finite element analysis method was used to evaluate stress characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two maxillary models were created in which the implants were placed in different locations (lateral and first premolar, canine and second premolar). Four implant-supported overdenture prostheses were reinforced, applying Co-Cr alloy, glass fiber, aramid fiber, and carbon fiber. Static loads of 200 N were applied on the first molar region using the food stuff method. Stresses around the implants and denture-bearing areas and compression and tensile stresses on the cortical and trabecular bone were evaluated. RESULTS: In all tested models, the highest von Mises stresses on implants and prostheses were observed in aramid fiber-reinforced overdentures. This was followed by glass fiber, Co-Cr alloy, and carbon fiber groups, respectively. It was observed that the lowest tensile and highest compression stress values in cortical and trabecular bone occurred in prostheses supported with carbon fiber. In all infrastructure materials, the design in which the implants were placed bilaterally in the lateral teeth and the first premolar region was found to be advantageous in terms of stress levels and distribution. CONCLUSION: High elastic modulus fiber-reinforced overdenture prostheses transmitted less stress to implants and surrounding tissues than Co-Cr alloy. Anteriorly placed implant design illustrated lower stress values in the prosthesis, implant, and cortical and trabecular bone, and this placement design may increase the survival rates of both dental implants and overdentures. In light of this study, fibers can be recommended for clinical use and securely applied as an alternative material to metal support. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:523-532. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9946.

Anaerobic adhesives effect on counter-torque of abutment screws on implants with external hexagon and conical connections: An in vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Abutment screw loosening is a common complication of implant supported prostheses, especially for single crowns. In engineering, anaerobic adhesives (AA) are used to provide chemical locking between screw surfaces, but their application in implantology remains unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to evaluate, in vitro, the effect of AA on counter-torque of abutment screws for cemented prosthesis on dental implants with external hexagon connection (EHC) and conical connection (CC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sample was composed by 60 specimens, 30 dental implants with EHC and 30 with CC. Abutments (transmucosal 3 mm straight universal abutment) were installed without AA (control group) or with application of AA with two different adhesive strength: medium strength (LOCTITE® 242) and high strength (LOCTITE® 277). The specimens were subjected to mechanical cycling at 37°C, with a load setting of 133 N, a 1.3 Hz frequency, and 1 200 000 cycles. The abutments were removed, and the counter-torque values were registered. Screws and implants were inspected using a stereomicroscope to verify the presence of residual adhesive and damage the internal structures. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and comparison tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Comparing to the torque of installation, the medium strength AA kept the counter-torque values for CC implants and the high strength AA kept the counter-torque for EHC implants and increased for CC implants. In the intergroup comparisons, control group presented significantly lower counter-torque values than other groups, both for EHC and CC implants. High strength AA presented similar results to medium strength AA in the EHC implants, but in the CC implants presented higher counter-torque values. Damage in threads was more frequent in the groups that received high strength AA. CONCLUSION: The use of AA increased the counter-torque of abutment screws, both in implants with EHC and CC.